The Leaders Debate!

A debate is a debate, is a debate, is a debate. And a State leader’s debate on February 17 was no different. The leaders of the two major parties, Jay Weatherill for the incumbent Labor Government and Steven Marshall for the Liberal Opposition fought it out trying to influence the voting public of South Australia. The election will take place on the 15^th of March, a mere 4 weeks away, and already the gloves are off and the politicking has begun.

While the Labor Government has created a reputation spanning the last 12 years the Liberal Opposition has been a relatively new creation. When the Government oozed confidence and composure at the hands of Mike Rann and then Jay Weatherill, the instability within the Liberal Party prevented them from gaining office. For many a year, the Liberals mimicked the Federal Labor Party with leadership tiffs and attempted spills the South Australian public were not keen enough to trust them with the precious keys to the state.

That, so it seems is all likely to change, if opinion polls and the general consensus on the streets is correct. Almost 20 points in front of the government, Marshall is positioning himself a worthy leader for a State that in the last few years has gone from strength to strength in terms of new infrastructure and global recognition. Named as one of 18 Smart Cities by National Geographic, listed on Lonely Planets top 10 cities to visit in 2014 and the accolades continue Adelaide is fast becoming a tourist hotspot. That is not to say we are without faults, Public Transport, Mental Health, relationships in Rural areas and taxes are all issues that will play a major role in voters decision in the next few weeks.

But the writing may already be on the wall for Jay and his team. Whether that be a continuing result from the federal election last September or the ‘its time’ factor coming to rear its ugly head once again, one this is for certain the Labor Government have its work cut out for them, if they want to be returned for a fourth term in power.  While if the Liberal get into power, they will have their work cut out for them, trying to convince voters they have what it takes to not only ‘fix’ the state but to work with the Federal Government to get the best results for the state and not just follow party lines.

The Leaders debate not only brought up issues closely related to the state, but that are also (or are tried to be) echoed at a Federal Level. Women in Politics, budget surpluses and deficits and unemployment are major concerns and worries for people from all walks of life. The fact major parties say they want to see more women in politics, but yet they are scarcely chosen for safe seats during preselections, although the Opposition Leader was quick to point out the plethora of women in his shadow ministry – a stark contrast to that in the Federal Cabinet. Furthermore with the closure of car manufacturing in Australia, entire suburbs in SA look set to lose the major employment  option, which will have catastrophic effects of families if the government, whomever it ends up being, doesn’t not have a foolproof plan ready to put in place. Politics can be all fun and games, but when it comes down to people lives and families people need to choose the best option for them.

With the fierce campaigning going on already, the table is set for some hard core political action in the coming weeks, and like always I will be here ready to bring you up to speed on all the important stuff, so stay tuned!

 

Do we need Electoral Reform in the Senate? Yes we do!

It was the day after sitting, and all through the house, not a pollie was stirring not even the house! They said there was a chance of showers in our nation’s capital but the air was humid and the flag hung still limp. After a quick trip to the High Court of Australia, were I was able to listen to an appeal proceed I was back for round three! Inside Parliament house there was a quietness that had not been present the last two days, and the formality of governing was not as distinct. Nevertheless, when the guard stationed at the entrance of the building recognises you from your previous visits you know you have serious political issues!

My destination was not the House of Representatives, but the Main Senate Committee Room, placed between the House and the Senate and was for a very special reason. The Senate, during the year host a number of Occasional Lectures, covering a wide range of political topics, and Yesterdays happened to be given by Antony “Mr Elections” Green on whether “Is it time for Fundamental Review of the Senates Electoral System?” Antony Green for all those not in the know, is one of Australia’s leading Psephologists and Election commentator for the ABC. As well as creating the election program which is used for every State and Federal Election as well as by-elections, he is a wealth of electoral political knowledge.

Since the 2013 Federal Election on September 7, many political commentators and reporters have been talking about the need for electoral reform in the Senate, because as of July first a record number of micro parties will be the balance of power in the Upper House. One of the more outspoken commentators regarding this matter has been Antony Green who advocates for simplicity rather than complexity when it comes to the way in which Senators are elected given they are elected for 6 year terms (rather than the 3 in the House of Reps) and in New South Wales 110 candidates contested 6 seats. Greens argument that even the most competent voter, one who had avidly studied preference flows could not have predicted the Senates outcome. Furthermore in Western Australia, where the Senate Outcome is still being contested, if less than 20 voters IN THE STATE had voted differently two different Senators would have been elected.

Green goes on to further back his claims, by using the example of the Liberals and the Liberal Democrats in New South Wales (but I know the same issue was in South Australia). Voters who wanted to vote for the Abbott lead Liberal Party when in fact they voted for the Liberal Democrats as they were at the beginning of the ballot paper. Green further states that in forcing voters to either choose backroom deals (above the line voting) or to be subjected to filling in up to 110 boxes is not acceptable anymore.

Saying that however, Green does provide possible solutions, however some would be more popular than others in the electorate. Among the more popular options, is optional preferential above or below the line. Above the line would require voters to list parties from one to N or below the line to a threshold of perhaps 50 or 2/3 the candidates and if the preferences need to flow longer then, that ballot would be disqualified. This option is quite popular in the community, however does pose some problems. Another solution would be to make senate candidates (or parties) achieve a minimum quota threshold on first preference votes to ensure that micro parties who receive under say 5% of the vote could not eventually get a seat.

One thing Green said is certain, is change will happen, as the current system is unmanageable for modern day politics in its current form, but whatever form it takes it must “ensure the Senate system reflects the will of the electorate” rather than backroom deals and “voters must have the power over preferences”.

Furthermore, in a democracy voters are the key, as it is them who ultimately decide who will make and create the laws in which we are need to live by. Therefore there is simply no point in a voting system which deters voters from being informed and when simplicity is the key complexities need to be avoided at all costs. 

My Day in the House of Reps - Day Two!

Well, they say no two days are the same in the hallowed halls of Parliament House, and I can attest to that first hand. Having spent the better part of two consecutive days sitting in the Public Gallery in the House of Representatives chamber, there are only three things I can say stayed the same on both days. The pollies coming and going, the press gallery journos coming in for the hour and a half of Question Time and me sitting directly across from Annabel Crabb during Question Time (Whoop Whoop!!). Other than that, my two days could not have been more different – but both equally incredible.

Today the weather was overcast, but still the Parliament building stood tall and proud. Heading straight up the left side of the building and cloaking my bag, electronics, pens and paper I headed into the green chamber once again. Hearing from the Leader of the Opposition Bill Shorten, The Member for Lindsay Fiona Scott, The Member for Hinkler Keith Pitt and others, I could not get over, this is what government and the real workings of parliament look like. Yes there are disagreements, fights, differing of opinion and party lines but at the end of the day it is the elected members, chosen by the electorate that make up the true essence of politics, giving speeches and debating legislation.

After being allowed back into the chamber for Question Time (the public galleries are cleared from 1pm -1.30pm), the public gets to listen to 90 second statements, which seek to bring to light any issues members feel are important. Today they ranged from Cervical Cancer to the Adelaide Heatwave to the Toyota job losses to surf lifesavers. While I have always known they have existed today I found a real appreciation for them, as they allow members to speak on important issues while keeping the reports to concise little bits. I found it an informative exercise and I think that the public should be more aware these statements exist given the overall lacking interest in all things political by the general population.

By golly Question Time was fun! After yesterday’s less than impressive show, I was hesitant to go back and do it all again, but I am so glad I did. On the 6^th Anniversary of Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech the House of Reps stood to attention.  After indulgencies from the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, it was time to get down to business. The sedate boring Question Time was nowhere to be seen, and within the first 15 minutes the topics of job losses, the new rising unemployment rate over 6% and the strength of the economy had all been raised. As well as the heightened use of Standing Order 94A which saw Labor Front Benches, Kate Ellis Member for Adelaide, Anthony Albanese Member for Grayndler and Catherine King Member for Ballarat all booted within the first 15 minutes. 10 Minutes later Mark Dreyfus Member for Isaacs booted, and before the session had ended The Members for Moreton, Gellibrand and Charlton were also forced to vacate the chamber. Although, if I am honest I was quite surprised many more Opposition Members were not booted. A question from the sole Greens Member Adam Bandt, Member for Melbourne, to the Prime Minister today broke the Liberal/National and Labor bickering but not for long. Further exciting the atmosphere, the Member for Kennedy made a late appearance in the Chamber sitting next to Independent Andrew Wilkie.

Having watched many many Question Times live streamed from inside classes, libraries and homes over the years, I find I am conflicted as to whether or not it was better being there in person or live streaming it and being able to converse with people all over the country at the same time. One of the many highlights to my day was sitting next to a man who smuggled a pencil into the chamber and let me borrow it during the session – all I can say is I am glad I was not kicked out!

My two days spent in the House of Representatives was well worth the trip and I seriously cannot wait to do it all over again!

 

Best Day Ever!

It began with a bus ride, and ended being one of the best days ever! Flying into the Capital last night, the lights radiating from the flag pole a top Parliament House I knew my trip would be awesome! After walking the clean spacious streets in Canberra City, I finally found the bus I needed and took the scenic route to my destination. The bus drove around the National Portrait Gallery, The National Library, Questacon, The Mint, Old Parliament House until I rolled around to the best building of them all. I still cannot get over the green grass striking even in the distance, and today, the flag hung limp with the lack of wind as I walked up the hill to Parliament House!

Walking into the white building the grandeur still took me by surprise, and in an instant I was in heaven. My first port of call was the cloaking room where I had to give up all electronics, bags, paper and pens (majorly disappointing and depressing!!!) set between the House of Representatives and the Senate before advancing any further. Although it seems like I didn’t do much today I had one of the best days ever. I listened to The Member for Hughes, The Member for Bendigo, The Member for Lyons and many others before the real fun even began. Just being able to sit in the Federation Chamber listening to the proceedings of Parliament, I watched a bill pass through the House of Reps Chamber as well as my local member The Honourable Amanda Rishworth.

Did you know that you have to book to get a seat in the Public Gallery for Question Time? Yeah I know, apparently this thing called Question Time is kinda popular… Seated between an old couple and an even older couple the smile on my face could not be wiped off! While not being able to tweet Question Time nearly killed me, it made me focus and really take in what was going on, AND where everyone sits. Starting at 2 o’clock (instead of 1.30pm when I am at home) the squabble between the Opposition and the Government began. One of the many highlights was seeing Cathy McGowan ask a question to break the Liberal/National and Labor arguing. The usually rowdy House of Reps chamber stayed fairly sedate for what I am used to, and it wasn’t until the 45 minute that ONE Labor Member, Mark Dreyfus was booted out under Standing Order 94A. However, after that much of anything was a bust. I counted 5 divisions before I had to leave, and Question Time was extended for the better part of an hour and a half.

I really cannot decide which part of my day was the best, sitting directly opposite some of the best political writers in the country (ANNABEL CRABB and Laura Tingle) or the fact I experienced a Question in real life. Or the fact I am now the proud owner of the Standing Orders for the House of Representatives. My day was magical and I cannot wait to do it all again tomorrow – with maybe a visit to the Senate as well! Long live Canberra! Long live Parliament! And Yay to the best day ever!

My A to Z of politics!

As another election, The South Australian State Election is creeping onto the political radar, I thought it would be a good time to create an A to Z of all things political to get us back into the voting mood!

A - Accountability Because all of our elected representatives need to be held accountable.

B- Backbencher Vital to any party winning Government.

C- Cabinet Without which, a Government would cease to exist.

D – Democracy The worst kind of political system, except for all the rest!

E – Election, Electorate Without either, politicians would not be elected, nor would they have anyone to vote for them!

F- Federalism The unification of a nation, so that powers are codified and distributed between levels of government.

G- Government The humble vessel in which the voting public place their trust and hopes in, to make the place we live in better.

H- Hansard All the recorded data including speeches and debates from with the chambers of Parliament.

I – Ideologies A way of organising different people who believe and accept the same lines of thought, and beliefs.

J- Judiciary The branch of Government that interprets the law, while remaining completely separate from parliament and the Executive.

K- Kitchen Cabinet A real term, used for the collective group of close advisors to the Prime Minister.

L- Law Pieces of legislation that have been passed by both chambers of parliament and have received the royal assent from either the Governor General, Governor or the King or Queen.

M- Member of Parliament A person elected to the House of Representatives, House of Assembly or Lower House.

N- NGO Non Governmental Organisation advocating for a particular cause.

O- Opposition A major party not in Government.

P- Party A collective group of Individuals registered with the Electoral Commission.

Q- Qualified Majority Rule Is the correct term for a vote that has received 50 + 1% of the total number of votes.

R- Republic A type of political system in which the leader of the Executive branch of Government is elected and not just appointed. Think America not Australia.

S- Standing Orders are the rules which must be adhered to inside both chambers at all times. The Speaker in the lower house is responsible for making sure politicians follow them as well as oversees all important business including the running of Question Time.

T- Treaties Agreements between countries, which can me bilateral (between two countries) or multilateral (between more than two counties).

U- Union An organisation set up to represent workers and workers’ rights also heavily involved in the left side of Australian Politics.

V- Voluntary Voting The act of choosing to vote rather than being forced to. Australia is one of only a few places worldwide that force voters to vote (except at local elections.)

W- Welfare A social policy designed to cater for people’s needs.

X- Xenophon, Nick A minor party Senator for South Australia, who has just been re-elected for a second time to the Federal Senate.

Y- Yawn The action most people associate with politics!

Z- Zoning The ability of Government’s to section land into different categories aimed at controlling lands purpose IE: Residential, Farming and Industrial.