Since early this afternoon, members in the House of
Representatives have been locked in a fierce debate about amendments to the
migration act, due to another distress signal from a boat of asylum seekers 107
nautical miles off the coast of Christmas Island. Earlier today Opposition
Leader Tony Abbott tried to table his own bill which would see that asylum
seekers are dealt with overseas, in Nauru, a country which HAS signed the
convention that ensures rights for refugees and asylum seekers, however leave was
not granted. Saying that, the government did back Independent Rob Oakshott’s
bill, which would allow both the governments’ Malaysia solutions, and the
Oppositions solution of Nauru to both be viable options under this legislation.
At 2.00pm AEST, Prime Minister Julia Gillard stood up in the chamber and said
that it was time to come to an agreement that “No-one [has] won, No-one [has]
lost, we just have to get the job done”, this then led the way for an afternoon
filled with MPs having the opportunity to voice their opinion about this issue.
From listening to this debate the underlying fact is that although some of the
technicalities differ from the government and the opposition both sides of
politics want to come to some sort of agreement as soon as possible. Obviously
the events that have happened today, are just the tip of the iceberg, so to
speak, boast of refugees are continuously coming to seek asylum in Australia,
but this debate is one that must happen, one that unless reaches an outcome
tonight, or in the very near future will just keep on happening, and at smaller
intervals than it currently is. So far the debate has been going on for more
than 6 hours straight, will MPs come to a decision? Let us hope so, and as I
write this, the sunset amendment clause was agreed to and the House of
Representatives has passed Oakshotts bill 74/72, and so it is with hesitant
eyes and ears that we watch the Senate tomorrow, where the legislation will
have a harder time passing.
No comments:
Post a Comment